<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jumping the Wrath Gun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/</link>
	<description>Seeking Better Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t want to sound as if I were contradicting myself all of a sudden but my point is actually that we have no way of discerning whether the leaks are legit, fake, legit but about to be overturned, or legit and there to stay.
My point is that it&#039;s simply too early to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t want to sound as if I were contradicting myself all of a sudden but my point is actually that we have no way of discerning whether the leaks are legit, fake, legit but about to be overturned, or legit and there to stay.<br />
My point is that it&#8217;s simply too early to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sev_07</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Sev_07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>Well good thing to hear it aint permanent, because when i first saw warrior talents i didnt know what to do first either cry or scream. Its nice to see that fury and prot gets few new GOOD things... but Arms tree once again is screwed completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well good thing to hear it aint permanent, because when i first saw warrior talents i didnt know what to do first either cry or scream. Its nice to see that fury and prot gets few new GOOD things&#8230; but Arms tree once again is screwed completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Well, you keep ending up in the Akismet spam filter for some reason. Who did you annoy to the point they&#039;d mark you as spam? :)

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/20/an-apology-to-stop-and-a-reply-on-death-knights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you keep ending up in the Akismet spam filter for some reason. Who did you annoy to the point they&#8217;d mark you as spam? <img src='http://altitis.treehuggers.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>See <a href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/20/an-apology-to-stop-and-a-reply-on-death-knights/">this here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Blah, double comments. So your fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah, double comments. So your fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;some of them just don’t make sense, so much to the point that it makes me question whether anyone at Blizzard has any sort of clue of how the warrior tree works in reality. Either that, or they’re fake.&lt;/i&gt;

I think when the changes are not percieved as under / overpowered or ignoring an existing weakness but instead appear completely stupid, &quot;fake&quot; seems to be the easiest explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>some of them just don’t make sense, so much to the point that it makes me question whether anyone at Blizzard has any sort of clue of how the warrior tree works in reality. Either that, or they’re fake.</i></p>
<p>I think when the changes are not percieved as under / overpowered or ignoring an existing weakness but instead appear completely stupid, &#8220;fake&#8221; seems to be the easiest explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>Depends. I see this period as a time to correct some clunky talent trees. Blizzard has the oppertunity to streamline the trees better, but I doubt they&#039;ll do it. Rampage, Enrage/Flurry or Rend would be good canidates. I read through some of these leaked notes and some of them just don&#039;t make sense, so much to the point that it makes me question whether anyone at Blizzard has any sort of clue of how the warrior tree works in reality. Either that, or they&#039;re fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends. I see this period as a time to correct some clunky talent trees. Blizzard has the oppertunity to streamline the trees better, but I doubt they&#8217;ll do it. Rampage, Enrage/Flurry or Rend would be good canidates. I read through some of these leaked notes and some of them just don&#8217;t make sense, so much to the point that it makes me question whether anyone at Blizzard has any sort of clue of how the warrior tree works in reality. Either that, or they&#8217;re fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/05/22/jumping-the-wrath-gun/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/?p=392#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Rampage has stayed the same since before BC was released and it still sucks. Blizzard has a very limited view on their own classes, and prefers to hide behind the guise of &quot;class balance&quot; to avoid making changes. There are a lot of issues with the Warrior talent trees that have largely been ignored since Day 1, and I&#039;ve grown to expect Blizzard to continue ignoring the problems with the trees. Blizzard can design all the paper changes they want, but that doesn&#039;t address the issue of existing talents that need work. Wrath should be a time for a complete tune up of talent trees, but that won&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rampage has stayed the same since before BC was released and it still sucks. Blizzard has a very limited view on their own classes, and prefers to hide behind the guise of &#8220;class balance&#8221; to avoid making changes. There are a lot of issues with the Warrior talent trees that have largely been ignored since Day 1, and I&#8217;ve grown to expect Blizzard to continue ignoring the problems with the trees. Blizzard can design all the paper changes they want, but that doesn&#8217;t address the issue of existing talents that need work. Wrath should be a time for a complete tune up of talent trees, but that won&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

