<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AddOns in Review: Introducing Damage Meters Benchmarking Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/</link>
	<description>If One Toon Just Isn't Enough, You Can Always Roll Another 49</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Blogging and Altitis Birthsday &#124; Altitis</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Blogging and Altitis Birthsday &#124; Altitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>[...] my Damage Meter benchmarking series are what interested most readers, attracting slightly over 10&#8242;000 pageviews over time. While [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my Damage Meter benchmarking series are what interested most readers, attracting slightly over 10&#8242;000 pageviews over time. While [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: Damage Meters in patch 2.4, one week later &#124; Altitis</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: Damage Meters in patch 2.4, one week later &#124; Altitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>[...] round-up of where the different damage meters are today in terms of parch 2.4 compatibility, not an in-depth benchmark. I ran a very quick solo hunter test, here are the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] round-up of where the different damage meters are today in terms of parch 2.4 compatibility, not an in-depth benchmark. I ran a very quick solo hunter test, here are the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damage Meters Benchmarking: Recount Maintainer Feedback &#124; Altitis</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Damage Meters Benchmarking: Recount Maintainer Feedback &#124; Altitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-920</guid>
		<description>[...] the pet damage discrepancies noted with the now outdated version I used during the first part of the series: 1) It’s a very widely held believe that WWS is most accurate and establishes a correct base [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the pet damage discrepancies noted with the now outdated version I used during the first part of the series: 1) It’s a very widely held believe that WWS is most accurate and establishes a correct base [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2008/01/20/introducing-damage-meters-benchmark/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>I'm looking forward to seeing your results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing your results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
