<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Plea for a Specialization-Driven Approach to Tanking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/</link>
	<description>If One Toon Just Isn't Enough, You Can Always Roll Another 49</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pondering where Death Knights will fit in Tanking &#124; Altitis</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Pondering where Death Knights will fit in Tanking &#124; Altitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>[...] and foremost, the DK&#8217;s proper tanking mechanism will determine which niche the class will occupy. Niches which currently remain largely unoccupied include, as others have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and foremost, the DK&#8217;s proper tanking mechanism will determine which niche the class will occupy. Niches which currently remain largely unoccupied include, as others have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I'm not saying you need 1 tank per specialization but with the three tank classes you should be able to match specialized tanking tasks to each class which is best suited for that particuliar one. If you have 5 idle tanks in your guild, I'm sure another one would kill to get them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying you need 1 tank per specialization but with the three tank classes you should be able to match specialized tanking tasks to each class which is best suited for that particuliar one. If you have 5 idle tanks in your guild, I&#8217;m sure another one would kill to get them <img src='http://altitis.treehuggers.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aelea</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>aelea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Most "normal" raiding guilds have enough trouble getting 3+ good (geared/keyed) tanks, 8 divisions is a bit overkill. Resources would be spread so think it would gimp the guild in the long run. Most have to take what they can get and do what they can to make sure they are up to spec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most &#8220;normal&#8221; raiding guilds have enough trouble getting 3+ good (geared/keyed) tanks, 8 divisions is a bit overkill. Resources would be spread so think it would gimp the guild in the long run. Most have to take what they can get and do what they can to make sure they are up to spec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My plea isn't aimed towards guilds which can clear a 25-men within 3 weeks of its release, or even 10 weeks.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Replying to myself is bad, m'kay, but who would I be fooling anyway? I have nothing to say which could be remotely of interest to them in anyway. As it is, the raiders in the worldfirstmobile and me could just as well be playing different games altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My plea isn&#8217;t aimed towards guilds which can clear a 25-men within 3 weeks of its release, or even 10 weeks.</i></p>
<p>Replying to myself is bad, m&#8217;kay, but who would I be fooling anyway? I have nothing to say which could be remotely of interest to them in anyway. As it is, the raiders in the worldfirstmobile and me could just as well be playing different games altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Key word you're using is &lt;i&gt;hardcore&lt;/i&gt;. The hardcore will take what works best with them, tend to have been established since BWL or AQ40 and are a well-oiled machine geared for eating up content.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What is most efficient to them is continue working with the most experienced tank they've had since Nef or C'Thun, not to experiment. On a recent thread on their own boards about tankadins, the Nihilum GL plain stated that he would never consider anything but a warrior as the MT. And that's fine.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My plea isn't aimed towards guilds which can clear a 25-men within 3 weeks of its release, or even 10 weeks. It's for the "normal" raiders who blindly rehash what the top 5 are saying... forgetting that if their tank was as skilled as Nihilum's, he wouldn't be playing with them, or they would have cleared BT &#038; Hijal in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key word you&#8217;re using is <i>hardcore</i>. The hardcore will take what works best with them, tend to have been established since BWL or AQ40 and are a well-oiled machine geared for eating up content.</p>
<p>What is most efficient to them is continue working with the most experienced tank they&#8217;ve had since Nef or C&#8217;Thun, not to experiment. On a recent thread on their own boards about tankadins, the Nihilum GL plain stated that he would never consider anything but a warrior as the MT. And that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>My plea isn&#8217;t aimed towards guilds which can clear a 25-men within 3 weeks of its release, or even 10 weeks. It&#8217;s for the &#8220;normal&#8221; raiders who blindly rehash what the top 5 are saying&#8230; forgetting that if their tank was as skilled as Nihilum&#8217;s, he wouldn&#8217;t be playing with them, or they would have cleared BT &#038; Hijal in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The question about what do you do with a paladin tank on a one-tank fight when the warrior is MT is a bit of a strawman, you even go to mention that a two-warrior raid won't know what to do with the second prot warrior either, so it's not as if the raid was worse off in any way - and with a gear switch, while the pallie remains a mediocre healer, he can still lend a hand here and there, even if it's only healing hunter pets so they stay on target longer to add DPS.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A hardcore raid will not take 2 Protection Warriors to a raid.  They will take 1 Prot, a Fury OT, and a Druid.  If they need a second Prot warrior, they will leave him outside the instance, and summon him when necessary.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for gear, most of their paladins will be collecting Prot and Ret gear from the leftovers.  Heck, I have pretty decent Prot and Ret sets, and I'm a primary healer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Finally, gear is not as important as it once was. Remember that Nihilum beat BT and Mount Hyjal in mostly T5 level gear. They didn't need to spend time farming the instance to gear up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The question about what do you do with a paladin tank on a one-tank fight when the warrior is MT is a bit of a strawman, you even go to mention that a two-warrior raid won&#8217;t know what to do with the second prot warrior either, so it&#8217;s not as if the raid was worse off in any way - and with a gear switch, while the pallie remains a mediocre healer, he can still lend a hand here and there, even if it&#8217;s only healing hunter pets so they stay on target longer to add DPS.</i></p>
<p>A hardcore raid will not take 2 Protection Warriors to a raid.  They will take 1 Prot, a Fury OT, and a Druid.  If they need a second Prot warrior, they will leave him outside the instance, and summon him when necessary.</p>
<p>As for gear, most of their paladins will be collecting Prot and Ret gear from the leftovers.  Heck, I have pretty decent Prot and Ret sets, and I&#8217;m a primary healer.</p>
<p>Finally, gear is not as important as it once was. Remember that Nihilum beat BT and Mount Hyjal in mostly T5 level gear. They didn&#8217;t need to spend time farming the instance to gear up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If something changed, and paladin tanks became hyper-powerful, the hardcore guilds would switch to that, and switch their warriors to DPS.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not at any time. Even Nihilum cannot take a healadin, just respec the guy and have him tank, they still have to gear him up. In the race to drive the Worldfirstmobile on new content, unless their traditional line-up gets severely nerfed somehow, they won't change a winning team at the risk of missing first kills. Only when there is a lull like between BT and SWP like now do they even have the luxury of considering other means of actions.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And again, from their perspective, it makes perfect sense. If your main warrior tank happens to be one of the world's best players who has spent two years honing his skills, why change it? He will still have two years of experience at tanking any and all content. And that's fine, it's also not something I argue against.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My point is that due to their visibility, they reinforce stereotypes by their example. Using different tanks for different tasks isn't something you have to consider when you have both the best players and the best gear at your disposal. My call is to the guild and raid leaders who are stuck with the notion that a warrior is one size fits it all while they are actually struggling from Kara to TK because of that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The question about what do you do with a paladin tank on a one-tank fight when the warrior is MT is a bit of a strawman, you even go to mention that a two-warrior raid won't know what to do with the second prot warrior either, so it's not as  if the raid was worse off in any way - and with a gear switch, while the pallie remains a mediocre healer, he can still lend a hand here and there, even if it's only healing hunter pets so they stay on target longer to add DPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If something changed, and paladin tanks became hyper-powerful, the hardcore guilds would switch to that, and switch their warriors to DPS.</i></p>
<p>Not at any time. Even Nihilum cannot take a healadin, just respec the guy and have him tank, they still have to gear him up. In the race to drive the Worldfirstmobile on new content, unless their traditional line-up gets severely nerfed somehow, they won&#8217;t change a winning team at the risk of missing first kills. Only when there is a lull like between BT and SWP like now do they even have the luxury of considering other means of actions.</p>
<p>And again, from their perspective, it makes perfect sense. If your main warrior tank happens to be one of the world&#8217;s best players who has spent two years honing his skills, why change it? He will still have two years of experience at tanking any and all content. And that&#8217;s fine, it&#8217;s also not something I argue against.</p>
<p>My point is that due to their visibility, they reinforce stereotypes by their example. Using different tanks for different tasks isn&#8217;t something you have to consider when you have both the best players and the best gear at your disposal. My call is to the guild and raid leaders who are stuck with the notion that a warrior is one size fits it all while they are actually struggling from Kara to TK because of that.</p>
<p>The question about what do you do with a paladin tank on a one-tank fight when the warrior is MT is a bit of a strawman, you even go to mention that a two-warrior raid won&#8217;t know what to do with the second prot warrior either, so it&#8217;s not as  if the raid was worse off in any way - and with a gear switch, while the pallie remains a mediocre healer, he can still lend a hand here and there, even if it&#8217;s only healing hunter pets so they stay on target longer to add DPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>What you are proposing is how the system &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; work.  For example, currently the best way to structure a healing team is by including 2 of each healing class.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The issue with tanking is slightly different: What do you do with a surplus tank on a one-tank fight?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the extra tank was a Fury/Prot warrior or a Druid, they could switch forms/gear/weapons and add reasonable DPS.  A paladin would add mediocre DPS or mediocre healing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Honestly, much the same problem happens to the second Protection Warrior in the raid. Fights that don't require a second tank leave him doing nothing useful.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yeah, a Prot paladin is great on AoE packs and trash, but she's not that useful the rest of the time.  And currently, Protection Warriors are just plain better suited to tanking the big, hard-hitting boss.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It's not so much about what you are contributing when you are tanking, it's about what you are contributing when you are &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; tanking.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, you may disagree with me about the effect of the hardcore on the game, but Korgath used to be a dying server.  Then Death &#038; Taxes transferred onto it, and the server was revitalized. That's pretty powerful evidence of their impact.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The hardcore don't play the game as it &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be, they play the game as it is. If something changed, and paladin tanks became hyper-powerful, the hardcore guilds would switch to that, and switch their warriors to DPS. For example, the status of Druid Tree of Life healers changed significantly in the patch that altered Lifebloom, and the hardcore led the way in that change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you are proposing is how the system <i>should</i> work.  For example, currently the best way to structure a healing team is by including 2 of each healing class.</p>
<p>The issue with tanking is slightly different: What do you do with a surplus tank on a one-tank fight?</p>
<p>If the extra tank was a Fury/Prot warrior or a Druid, they could switch forms/gear/weapons and add reasonable DPS.  A paladin would add mediocre DPS or mediocre healing.</p>
<p>Honestly, much the same problem happens to the second Protection Warrior in the raid. Fights that don&#8217;t require a second tank leave him doing nothing useful.</p>
<p>Yeah, a Prot paladin is great on AoE packs and trash, but she&#8217;s not that useful the rest of the time.  And currently, Protection Warriors are just plain better suited to tanking the big, hard-hitting boss.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much about what you are contributing when you are tanking, it&#8217;s about what you are contributing when you are <i>not</i> tanking.</p>
<p>Also, you may disagree with me about the effect of the hardcore on the game, but Korgath used to be a dying server.  Then Death &#038; Taxes transferred onto it, and the server was revitalized. That&#8217;s pretty powerful evidence of their impact.</p>
<p>The hardcore don&#8217;t play the game as it <i>should</i> be, they play the game as it is. If something changed, and paladin tanks became hyper-powerful, the hardcore guilds would switch to that, and switch their warriors to DPS. For example, the status of Druid Tree of Life healers changed significantly in the patch that altered Lifebloom, and the hardcore led the way in that change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaziel</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaziel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/07/a-plea-for-a-specialization-driven-approach-to-tanking/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Well said. As my guild's "Main tank" and a Paladin tank to boot, I can agree with your points about having a Paladin tank the trash in Karazhan. We bring along at least one warrior (have yet to be able to find a Bear spec feral druid) for a number of the fights that I can't tank, but I do end up tanking most of the fights in Kara. Fights where the warrior takes over tanking instead of me are Maiden, Tito (silence bad), Julianne, and the elementals in Curator's room. He also assists me on the two mob pulls leading up to Prince's room.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, before you say that I should let the warrior tank other fights, such as Attumen or Curator, I agree, but right now our only full-time (non-DPS) warrior is a relatively recent 70 and wearing a mix of greens, blues and I think 1 or 2 Kara Purples. In other words, he's still too weak to replace me in any fight I don't do too badly on. As soon as he gets his hands on some really decent tanking gear I'll start standing back for some of those fights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. As my guild&#8217;s &#8220;Main tank&#8221; and a Paladin tank to boot, I can agree with your points about having a Paladin tank the trash in Karazhan. We bring along at least one warrior (have yet to be able to find a Bear spec feral druid) for a number of the fights that I can&#8217;t tank, but I do end up tanking most of the fights in Kara. Fights where the warrior takes over tanking instead of me are Maiden, Tito (silence bad), Julianne, and the elementals in Curator&#8217;s room. He also assists me on the two mob pulls leading up to Prince&#8217;s room.</p>
<p>Now, before you say that I should let the warrior tank other fights, such as Attumen or Curator, I agree, but right now our only full-time (non-DPS) warrior is a relatively recent 70 and wearing a mix of greens, blues and I think 1 or 2 Kara Purples. In other words, he&#8217;s still too weak to replace me in any fight I don&#8217;t do too badly on. As soon as he gets his hands on some really decent tanking gear I&#8217;ll start standing back for some of those fights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
