<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From 2v2 to 3v3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/</link>
	<description>Seeking Better Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Adventsparky</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Adventsparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Ah I&#039;m not doing too badly though, 11.2k hp ish, 210 resil and 1.1k spell dmg.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m soooo bored of SL/SL even after such a short amount of time. Not doing the damage I could be. Shopping around for a new arena spec atm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I&#8217;m not doing too badly though, 11.2k hp ish, 210 resil and 1.1k spell dmg.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m soooo bored of SL/SL even after such a short amount of time. Not doing the damage I could be. Shopping around for a new arena spec atm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerei</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>A rogue would probably be your best all-around bet, they do quite well in this bracket and are low-maintenance (when played well) compared to some other choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rogue would probably be your best all-around bet, they do quite well in this bracket and are low-maintenance (when played well) compared to some other choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Pity you&#039;re still short on the resilience, eh Sparky? :-p&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We picked a rogue out of our brand new guild, skirmished thrice and realized we should have interviewed and armoury-checked the gentleman. He is keen and eager but goes &quot;splat&quot; within seconds.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On the other hand, I seem to be unable to walk 5 yards in Shatt without getting at least on whisper begging me for a spot. We may eventually get a good rogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity you&#8217;re still short on the resilience, eh Sparky? :-p</p>
<p>We picked a rogue out of our brand new guild, skirmished thrice and realized we should have interviewed and armoury-checked the gentleman. He is keen and eager but goes &#8220;splat&#8221; within seconds.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I seem to be unable to walk 5 yards in Shatt without getting at least on whisper begging me for a spot. We may eventually get a good rogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I run a 43/7/11 Affliction spec. I wouldn&#039;t recommend it though unless you are paired with a Shadow Priest OR have 300+ Resilience with 11k~ HP. Super squishy it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a 43/7/11 Affliction spec. I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it though unless you are paired with a Shadow Priest OR have 300+ Resilience with 11k~ HP. Super squishy it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adventsparky</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Adventsparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Priest was the one that came to mind for myself and Gwaendar suggested Rogue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Out of interested Megan, What spec does your lock run in 3v3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priest was the one that came to mind for myself and Gwaendar suggested Rogue.</p>
<p>Out of interested Megan, What spec does your lock run in 3v3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>A Rogue worked for us. Combat or Mutilate. A geared Shadow Priest (one built for tanking, as they usually are first to be focus fired) is good too.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On paper, a Warrior should seem ok too, but 3v3 is all about the counter classes your opponents might have, and because of the popularity of Paladin/Priest/Warrior, Paladin/Shaman/Warrior, and Warrior/Warrior/X, you might have to weed though many stacked caster teams---rough facing CS/Silence/Spell Lock in the face of your Warrior being bursted down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Rogue worked for us. Combat or Mutilate. A geared Shadow Priest (one built for tanking, as they usually are first to be focus fired) is good too.</p>
<p>On paper, a Warrior should seem ok too, but 3v3 is all about the counter classes your opponents might have, and because of the popularity of Paladin/Priest/Warrior, Paladin/Shaman/Warrior, and Warrior/Warrior/X, you might have to weed though many stacked caster teams&#8212;rough facing CS/Silence/Spell Lock in the face of your Warrior being bursted down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adventsparky</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Adventsparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/11/01/from-2v2-to-3v3/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I think some decent queue times would work well with that setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some decent queue times would work well with that setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
