<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Problem with healing in BGs? I think not.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/</link>
	<description>If One Toon Just Isn't Enough, You Can Always Roll Another 49</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwaendar</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwaendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, I don't have anything even remotely smart or insightful to say about Ret. I haven't been Ret since level 34 (with a 2-hour exception at level 67) and don't feel at ease commenting on either the tree's shortcomings or the proposed fixes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But since threat has already been an issue with Ret for a long time, I expect this will improve, that's why I believe those adjustements will benefit PvP instead of PvE. Having a Ret pallie using GBoS on himself to lower his threat output automatically rules out a pallie tank - so being forced to use the normal instead of greater blessing by the simple virtue of having another spec of your own class in the raid is, in my eyes, a very poor PvE implementation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But beyond such musings, frankly, I haven't even PUGed with a ret pallie since Slave Pens in my early 60ies. I honestly don't have a clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, I don&#8217;t have anything even remotely smart or insightful to say about Ret. I haven&#8217;t been Ret since level 34 (with a 2-hour exception at level 67) and don&#8217;t feel at ease commenting on either the tree&#8217;s shortcomings or the proposed fixes.</p>
<p>But since threat has already been an issue with Ret for a long time, I expect this will improve, that&#8217;s why I believe those adjustements will benefit PvP instead of PvE. Having a Ret pallie using GBoS on himself to lower his threat output automatically rules out a pallie tank - so being forced to use the normal instead of greater blessing by the simple virtue of having another spec of your own class in the raid is, in my eyes, a very poor PvE implementation.</p>
<p>But beyond such musings, frankly, I haven&#8217;t even PUGed with a ret pallie since Slave Pens in my early 60ies. I honestly don&#8217;t have a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gt</title>
		<link>http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>gt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altitis.treehuggers.info/2007/10/12/a-problem-with-healing-in-bgs-i-think-not/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Whats your thought on the Ret changes not including a threat reduction mechanism that everyone is QQing for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats your thought on the Ret changes not including a threat reduction mechanism that everyone is QQing for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
